The solar + storage industry evolves rapidly as new technologies and capabilities come to market. Meanwhile, the bureaucratic institutions that regulate how these systems interconnect to the grid usually lag far behind. But some standout states are finally making significant progress on catching up.
The Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) has led the charge on modernizing interconnection across the country. Most recently, the group’s work with the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (NMPRC) has led to one of the most progressive new interconnection rulings nationwide.
One breakthrough of New Mexico’s ruling was establishing special considerations for energy storage interconnection. Prior rules made no mention of energy storage, leading utilities to either deny non-energy-exporting solar + storage projects or study them as if the battery was fully exporting power to the grid, just like the solar array.
“They’re usually designed to charge from the solar and then discharge into the evening hours, but the default for a utility would be to study [batteries] as though they are simultaneously exporting, which would significantly increase the potential grid impacts,” said Sky Stanfield, lawyer for IREC and partner at law firm Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger.
So IREC and its partners set out to give utilities the required information to study energy storage projects differently, considering the battery’s ability to limit energy exports to the grid. Those “limited exports” are made possible by UL-certified power control systems, which can be programmed based on settings established by utilities. IREC brought research from its Dept. of Energy-supported BATRIES (Building a Technically Reliable Interconnection Evolution for Storage) report to New Mexico’s proceedings to develop these new evaluations or “screens” for energy storage interconnection.
“You give the utilities the confidence that these are safe and reliable means and then you make sure that they’re reviewing the projects appropriately in in the screening process,” Stanfield said.
New Mexico’s ruling also includes what’s known as “inadvertent exports” in storage interconnection planning — meant to address the power that is unintentionally exported from a distributed energy resource when the load drops off suddenly, before the power control system can respond to the signal to limit or stop export, according to IREC.
“New Mexico is the first state to adopt that screen. We think that’s a really important step forward and should give utilities the confidence that they aren’t going to see impacts from inadvertent export and clarifies the process from the developer standpoint as well,” Stanfield said.
The state will also require using smart inverters that comply with the IEEE 1547 standard on new projects starting in spring 2023. Smart inverters can make autonomous decisions to keep the grid stable as more distributed resources come online or the grid’s voltage or frequency fluctuates. Each utility will set forth its own smart inverter technical interconnection and interoperability requirements to ensure it’s in sync with the grid’s needs, but it must align with the NMPRC’s ruling.
Along with new considerations for batteries and inverters, New Mexico’s ruling attempts to expedite the interconnection process. Applicants will now be allowed to make limited modifications to an application to fix any issues that arise in the study process, without being sent to the back of the interconnection queue. This should especially help developers working with utilities that don’t provide much upfront information on grid status.
“Where you don’t have a really detailed hosting capacity map, you can’t figure any of this out in advance. So, the screening and study process becomes a little bit more interactive between the customer and the utility,” Stanfield said.
New Mexico isn’t the only state making progress on streamlining and accurately studying interconnection of solar + storage systems. New York, Maryland, Massachusetts and others have either already implemented or started working on energy storage and smart inverter integration. But those states can look to the Southwest for a holistic road map for interconnection overhaul.
“There’s such a diversity on each issue. It’s hard to say one state has it all. And that’s why I think we’re excited about what the New Mexico rule is,” Stanfield said. “They didn’t just do a little bit of good stuff over here and then backtrack over here. They went ahead and tried to do a comprehensive update.”
This story is part of SPW’s 2023 Trends in Solar. Read all of this year’s trends here.
Paul Johnson says
Hello Wayne. Having previously offered it with another company and doing the due diligence, I confer with Kelly on the “not fans” assessment. Their specs do point out pitch limitations and I assume you’re good with that but I think your comment on 4 attempts with Tesla speaks for itself; the communication will not get better. Having been in this industry for a while, and knowing so many former Tesla employees, I’d say keep other options open, but that’s just my 2 cents. Best of luck!
Solarman says
I noticed in the picture SolArc inverters are being used. One can set these systems up for A.C. or D.C. and even A.C. and D.C. charging of the battery pack. One can install a transfer switch and a secondary C.B. panel that can be powered by the grid or by the battery backed ESS as a resilience system. The battery backed ESS is becoming more sophisticated to the point of micro-grid applications at the residential level. Grid agnostic is a good thing for the retail residential user, not so good for the rote IOU electric utilities. Smart C.B. panels and circuit breaker blocks can tailor a system for power shedding allowing an ESS to power critical circuits in the home in perpituity. So, grid tied, all grid or off grid. Is the grid reliable, one doesn’t care so much about that anymore. Is the grid up or down?, Whatevers dude.
Solarman says
There is still the physics of solar PV cells in general to keep in mind. Solar tiles can be made and installed on one’s roof and yet when one puts them directly on the roof as part of the “roofing” material, the common air gap allowed by installing racking and panels on a roof allows better cooling and solar PV output during any given day of operation. The tiles will be derated due to temperature changes throughout the year. Some of the early TESLA designs show roof tiles with connectors that snap into other TESLA tiles to make arrays. It is not clear how TESLA solar PV tile 3.0 fares in current roofing installations. Solar PV framed and individual panels are at least a 50 year old technology and proven to be robust in the many climates and roofs the panels are installed on. With micro-inverters or converters each panel can have an addressable module to send information to a web site to gather and display how the solar PV array performs on any given day. The addressable inverters/converters can also be used to troubleshoot panel and or micro-inverter, converter problems for quick replacement or repair.
Wayne Yancey says
Good morning Kelsey,
My name is Wayne Yancey. I am a specifier for CallisonRTKL (Architecture | Interior Design) in Seattle WA.
I have a project on the island of Lana’i HI anticipating the use of Tesla Solar shingles for a large steep pitched roof for a commercial project.
Wikipedia is unflattering about Tesla and Tesla Solar shingles. Do you or your colleagues have factual information about this product? Good, bad or indifferent.
I have made 4 attempts via a Tesla online chat to learn technical information about how these panels are installed and the recommended structure supporting the shingles.
I would appreciate your opinions.
Kelly Pickerel says
We’re not huge fans. Here’s more info about solar shingles: https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2019/04/the-latest-on-solar-roofs-solar-shingles-and-solar-tiles/